<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>. . . &#187; Lydia Davis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eugenelim.com/tag/lydia-davis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eugenelim.com</link>
	<description>임유진</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Varieties of Disturbance by Lydia Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.eugenelim.com/2008/03/30/varieties-of-disturbance-by-lydia-davis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eugenelim.com/2008/03/30/varieties-of-disturbance-by-lydia-davis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eugene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lydia Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eugenelim.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;varieties&#8217; is accurate in that she has several techniques, vaguely constellated around her interests (of translation and epistemology, of &#8216;deep ideas&#8217; of self). she&#8217;s a great bridge to the Modernists&#8230; she&#8217;s thinking about them&#8211;Kafka, Proust, Beckett, Woolf&#8211;throughout, but we hear her thinking in a very contemporary language, one that is constructed and fragmented *from* modernism, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="userReview"><span id="freeTextreview1441450" class="reviewText"><img src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/photo.goodreads.com/books/1171681609m/113862.jpg" alt="" width="107" height="160" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="userReview"><span class="reviewText">&#8216;varieties&#8217; is accurate in that she has several techniques, vaguely constellated around her interests (of translation and epistemology, of &#8216;deep ideas&#8217; of self).</p>
<p>she&#8217;s a great bridge to the Modernists&#8230; she&#8217;s thinking about them&#8211;Kafka, Proust, Beckett, Woolf&#8211;throughout, but we hear her thinking in a very contemporary language, one that is constructed and fragmented *from* modernism, a cento of modernism. relatedly: she&#8217;s a good mimic. beyond this also, she&#8217;s several of her own styles. </span></span></p>
<p><span class="userReview"><span class="reviewText"><br />
the short shorts that worked best for me were those that point to that one vaguely has experienced but has never been able to articulate&#8211;and so come with an a-ha! &#8230;some however were confounding and i wonder that in these absolutely crucibled forms (the FF) if authors are forced to use personal or limited connotations of language that simply don&#8217;t &#8216;mean&#8217; for everyone, and thereby necessarily create (unintentionally?) obtuse texts&#8230;<br />
&#8220;The walk&#8221; is so far my favorite. at first glance seems a very traditional story&#8211;about two people, a proust translator and a proust critic, taking a proustian walk&#8211;but reveals itself to be self-commenting, creating a neat and mirrored world (which in itself is an act which comments on proust&#8217;s architecture of the two ways). also a beautiful style, wistful.</p>
<p>other longer ones are exhausting and exhaustive thought experiments, some by their exhausting function are similar in their ambitions to sorrentino&#8217;s use of the exhaustive list&#8230;<br />
by her carefully chosen and paced varieties, she satisfyingly obliterates the dichotomy of show and tell.</p>
<p></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span class="userReview"><span id="freeTextreview1441450" class="reviewText">&#8220;Enlightened,&#8221; in entirety:</p>
<p>I don’t know if I can remain friends with her. I’ve thought and thought about it &#8211; she’ll never know how much. I gave it one last try: I called her, after a year. But I didn’t like the way the conversation went. The problem is that she is not very enlightened. Or I should say, she is not enlightened enough for me. She is nearly fifty years old and no more enlightened, as far as I can see, than when I knew her twenty years ago, when we talked mainly about men. I did not mind how unenlightened she was then, maybe because I was not so enlightened myself. I believe I am more enlightened now, and certainly more enlightened than she is, although I know it’s not very enlightened to say that. But I want to say it, so I am willing to postpone being more enlightened myself so that I can still say a thing like that about a friend. </span></span></p>
<p><span class="userReview"></span></p>
<p><span class="userReview"><span class="reviewText"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0374281734?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=httpwwwgoodco-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0374281734&amp;SubscriptionId=1MGPYB6YW3HWK55XCGG2" target="_blank">consume via amazon.</a></span></span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eugenelim.com/2008/03/30/varieties-of-disturbance-by-lydia-davis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

